Last night during the Brit awards we noticed several people on Twitter alluding to the fact that our designer Bryan James had a similar look to Justin Bieber. What do you reckon? Let us know by tweeting with the following hash tag #bryanbieber
Design student progression in todays world
Being in the design industry now for a little over 11 years, it feels an age ago since I was a student myself, but as time and technology have moved on so have the output standards of a lot of todays students.
Constantly surfing the web I come across students showing their wares and what they can do on various blog site and it amazes me the technology available to them at universities across the globe. Packaging design seems to be a discipline where they can really produce some beautiful work that looks so finished and polished because of prototype and mockup technologies available to them… Something I never really had, this also applies to print design and the ability to create almost finished publications.
Imagine what can be done in another 11 years time!
Modern Trends and Suitability
In the design field as a whole, especially in financial times as we are in at the moment, clients tend to panic a little and throw clarity, creativity and logic out of the window in favour of cramming all they can into a piece of marketing, and current trends in website design are no different.
Bandwagon jumping is common, and you get a lot of clients desiring social media application when it simply isn’t suitable. This isn’t to say it isn’t a very useful tool, but it must be applied with care and suitability. Furthermore, we at england believe that simply placing a Facebook ‘like’ on a piece of content isn’t using the technology to it’s capacity, it’s what you do with it that matters.
And this philosophy blends in nicely to what we believe about mobile marketing. Again, suitability is key, and it’s important to heavily research a client’s user base before reviewing if a mobile solution is useful – But when it is, it is a magnificent and exciting platform for both the client and ourselves. ‘Apps’ appear to be the flavour of the week at the moment, and they are tremendously enticing to work on for both designers and developers but a lot has to be done before those stages to ensure that they are actually used – The mobile user is a very different animal to the web user, and grabbing attention amongst the buzz of it all, is a harder lock to pick than ever.
england’s Dos and Donts of Designing Experience
Don’t use Photoshop. This is a huge topic of heated discussion in the web design industry, but we at england believe a software suite is there to be used to it’s capacity.
If you asked an artworker to put together a 64-page brochure in Photoshop, they would kindly ask ‘Excuse me?’ – Web design is no different. Photoshop is an extremely impressive tool… for image creation and manipulation, which should then be followed by the application of those images in a program like Fireworks.
Designing in-browser – Again, a matter which gets heaved between developers and designers like a tug-of-war. For us, design should never be shackled by unnecessary boundaries. You want to wow a client, make something which is not only functional but is as beautiful as possible. Worry about how you do it later on, that’s how boundaries are broken and standards are stretched.
Lastly, a web designer should be clued up about developing the website. If you’re not thinking about hover states, active states, text-highlighting styles, all of the functional visual elements that every great website has which aren’t part of the original flat visual – Then you haven’t designed a website, you’ve put a picture together. And that is what makes website design not only a very different medium to print, but such an exciting one for a designer. A print designer places the slightly warm stock beneath their nose and basks in the glory of that freshly printed aroma. A web designer experiences through feeling their way around a site in much the same way but with a mouse, and the sensation of a hover state followed by an active state upon clicking delivers a similar thrill.
Is your biggest asset killing your business?
Clients, customers, consumers, clientele – call them what you will, they are the life-blood of any commercial organisation. External clients, internal clients, stakeholders, shareholders – there are lots of people with an influence over our collective corporate futures.
We spend a lot of time, focus, marketing effort, cash and other resources chasing new customers –they pay the bills after all, fuel our growth, flatter our credentials and swell our brag-file. The right customers motivate our staff, some even say ‘thanks’ every now and again, and we develop relationships with them that can stretch from the boardroom to the bar. In business to business markets we try to build loyalty with our clients by working hard, going the extra mile, adding value at every turn, and being generally all-round heroic in an ongoing effort to win and retain business. We rightly consider our client base as a key asset, but how often do we question, if ever, the integrity of the asset base. In other words, do we blindly assume that the perfect customer is one spending money to the exclusion of all else, and if not, do we have the bottle, foresight and strength of character to do anything about it?
There has been a lot of talk in the recent recession about toxic assets, an oxymoron if ever there was one – up there in the same league as military intelligence and giant shrimp. An asset that should be good for you, should strengthen your business, but has gone wrong and is now seriously detrimental. But I’d like to add a new classification of asset type for a creature that we all recognise but often deny exists – the toxic client.
Toxic clients are as dangerous and risky an asset as an Icelandic sub-prime mortgage. And whilst toxic clients have been around ever since our Neanderthal cousins traded furs for flints, the profligation of the breed during the recent economic squeeze has been significant. A toxic client is one who burns up resource without paying, who expects the moon on a stick but then queries everything, demotivates all around them, and limits your ability to grow. Thankfully, I haven’t had to deal with a toxic client in my business for over ten years, but I did have a lesson in toxicity first hand at the time. In the end, the relationship ended and although the following year our turnover halved, our profit for the year increased by 20%.
I see toxic clients in my customers customers every day, and my point to my clients is this. Strong brands have positive standards and are virtuous –hardly the characteristics of a toxic client. Thus you may recognise toxic clients in your own customer base and you may endure them or you may not. But my question is ‘are you a toxic client to your supply chain?’ And if you are, then forget all the marketing hyperbole, the brand book and the ad campaigns, because if you’re toxic think about what that is that saying about your brand.
